Arnieduke Joined: 2001-12-28 Posts: 194 Files: 0 Thanked: 0 Downloaded: 0 Uploaded: 0 |
Today my subscription of Footworshipstudios (FWS) ends and I thought I´d share my thoughts on this site with you. First of all, FWS is a pure girl-girl foot worship site. Updates are something like one set a week (did not check exactly). First come the high res photos, then the screen caps followed by the video set each a day apart. I concentrated on the videos of this site, which are MPEG4 and good quality. Each video set consists of 3 files of about 45Mb and about 2mins running time. Pros: -The girls are mostly good to very good looking foot-wise and otherwise -Some girls seem to especially enjoy worshipping feet which makes watching even more pleasurable -Nice worshipping positions -Sets with more than 2 girls are cool -In some sets the girls are switching positions Cons: -Some girls seem to be doing it "for the money" and are not enjoying themselves. -Too hasty worshipping sometimes -Too much toe-sucking for my taste. Usually the first two vids of a set focus on that only the 3rd one goes into sole licking, which I love most. -Sole-licking: not long enough, lack of close-ups, when there are close-ups, they are sometimes even too close (the tongue is filling the whole picture rather than the whole foot) Concerning this point: I was extremely disappointed of the video set in which Tia Tanaka gets worshipped. I saw her on fuckingmachines and was thrilled by her soles. She was one of the reasons I made another subscription to FWS. Melanie Scott is doing an awesome job with her soles starting at the end of the 2nd vid and the whole 3rd one BUT the camera perspective was rather disappointing. Close up came too late and was too close at some point. This girl had deserved more. When the vid reaches the best point if suddenly ends. If you had put in another 2 mins it would probably have been fantastic. -Sometimes exaggerated worshipping (putting all toes into the mouth, which is just like WTF? for me) -Videos end very suddenly, I would love to see something like, the worshipping girl stops and says "I´m done, did you like it?" Then maybe some kissing or the girls leaving the set. Overall I give the site a 7 out of 10. Considering that a 30 month subscription only costs $12,95 it is worth a try to see if you like it. | ||
footworshipstudiosdotcom Joined: 2007-04-23 Posts: 913 Files: 0 Thanked: 0 Downloaded: 0 Uploaded: 0 |
Thank you, Arnieduke, for your detailed review of my site.
Updates are 6 days a week. Each week I put up 120-175 new Hi Rez photos, approx 200 screen captures and 15-18 minutes of very high quality mpegs (about 250mb/quarter gb per week). I try to give a higher than expectation g/g foot worship experience to my customers, who I believe are the best and smartest guys and girls around I am pretty much in agreement with all of your pros and cons. Each of the cons I identified myself before as something I'd like to remedy (sometimes I thought of it while filming), but many factors come into play that make it difficult or impossible to remedy during filming or editing. These are the type of well-thought out critiques that I appreciate and help me make a better site. Even though I have one of most content rich sites as well as most updated, I want to keep the price attractive (esp as my site is only 6 mos old), so the 1st month is $15.95US and $12.95US for rebills. Personally I give myself a 10 of 10 or at least a 9.5 Thank you | ||
|
NorCow Joined: 2007-08-16 Posts: 97 Files: 0 Thanked: 0 Downloaded: 0 Uploaded: 0 |
Inappropriate webmaster spamming of the review section. It was a fair and balanced review until you butted in . Let the critics speak their mind. Put the honest feedback into your mental computer. No need to rationalize your obviously biased commercial interests, and finally, different parts of the same weekly set do not count as daily updates.
 | ||
|
Arnieduke Joined: 2001-12-28 Posts: 194 Files: 0 Thanked: 0 Downloaded: 0 Uploaded: 0 |
Concerning webmasters replying to reviews of their own site we already have a thread going on this forum. As far as I am concerned it is ok to answer although your rating of your own site was too obvious. Thank you though for straightening out some facts for me.
| ||
|
footworshipstudiosdotcom Joined: 2007-04-23 Posts: 913 Files: 0 Thanked: 0 Downloaded: 0 Uploaded: 0 |
Thanks again, Arnieduke.
Norcow- There is nothing inappropriate about a webmaster responding publicly to a review of his/her work. And you have an extremely loose definition of spamming or you don't know what the word means, I'm afraid. I didn't butt in or edit his review, as a matter of fact he emailed me and told me he posted a review here. I simply made a post, as you did. I update Monday-Saturday, even on holidays, and with more more photo/video content per day/week/month than any foot site I've been to with possible exception of hotlegsandfeet, which costs twice what mine does. I will, I suppose, thank you for the smile and wink, but it's the only part of your post not cynical and grumpy.  | ||
|
NorCow Joined: 2007-08-16 Posts: 97 Files: 0 Thanked: 0 Downloaded: 0 Uploaded: 0 |
Personally I give myself a 10 of 10 or at least a 9.5Having the audacity to rate your own own web-site falls under spam in my book. | ||
|
footworshipstudiosdotcom Joined: 2007-04-23 Posts: 913 Files: 0 Thanked: 0 Downloaded: 0 Uploaded: 0 |
Your book must be full of incorrectly used words then, my friend. So you can use the term "appropriately" next time:
spam - verb [ trans. ] send the same message indiscriminately to large numbers of recipients on the Internet. Me rating my own site was meant to be tongue-in-cheek or ironic. Let's not be so humorless and just enjoy beautiful female feet and this excellent forum. Thanks | ||
|
nasuper Joined: 2007-02-21 Posts: 393 Files: 0 Thanked: 0 Downloaded: 0 Uploaded: 0 |
not so many "eyes-to-cam-acting" and lesser inkhorn and the site would be very good i think.
| ||
|
footworshipstudiosdotcom Joined: 2007-04-23 Posts: 913 Files: 0 Thanked: 0 Downloaded: 0 Uploaded: 0 |
Hi Nasuper, Yes, I remember in the past our discussions of looking in the camera. I have drastically cut that down, but sometimes I will ask them to look since I only get attractive girls and I and others want to see their eyes. I think your post has a typo when it says "lesser inkhorn" If you get a chance, please explain what you meant. Thanks!
| ||
|
leftsole Joined: 2007-05-22 Posts: 286 Files: 0 Thanked: 0 Downloaded: 0 Uploaded: 0 |
| ||
|
footworshipstudiosdotcom Joined: 2007-04-23 Posts: 913 Files: 0 Thanked: 0 Downloaded: 0 Uploaded: 0 |
Thank you for your comments, LeftSole, it's not taken as a slam at all. I realize there are lots of guys who prefer b/g foot worship and that's cool. I just think g/g foot worship is the sexiest thing imaginable. Thanks
| ||
|
Dirty Dirt Fan Joined: 2000-09-02 Posts: 63 Files: 0 Thanked: 0 Downloaded: 0 Uploaded: 0 |
I agree Footworshipstudiosdotcom. For many of us, close ups showing a Male tongue and saliva all over the pretty Female feet is just a turn off. Much better having a pretty Female face and tongue doing the deed. Keep up the good work.
| ||
|
Nouhan07 Joined: 0000-00-00 Posts: 2 Files: 0 Thanked: 0 Downloaded: 0 Uploaded: 0 |
G/G Footworship = THE BEST !
Review of this site. Site : It is basecally html site. Subcription : 19,95 € the first month and 14,95 € recurring. Models : 70% of them are really pretty with wonderful feet. Content : A quality and large content, G/G, G/G/G and G/G/G/G Pictures, caps and movie My opinion : Is site will be one of the best, but as an i'm a fetish, i want more movie content. No, not more, but more valuable content. Movie are only 7,8,9 minutes, with 3 .mov or mpeg, of 2-3 minutes each one. No transition between poses... A perfect length for one unique movie per update, while be 15 minutes, that's a good deal, I think. Well, with this type of content, I will subscribe for life. Vidéo encodage needs desinterlaced, all video are interlaced, this is not very pro. This site as a great potentiel, but to become a must to have, he need some adjustement, in the movie content. Great site ! | ||
|
SoleReaver21 Joined: 2002-04-21 Posts: 153 Files: 0 Thanked: 0 Downloaded: 0 Uploaded: 0 |
I'll chime in as a past subscriber to FWS. For my tastes, FWS is probably the best bang for your buck if you're into G/G worship primarily, as I am. Sure, it'd be nice if all the models at least acted like they had a foot fetish and were into it but that's wishful thinking. There's nowhere else you can get multiple weekly video updates of barefoot g/g worship. Even HLAF only does 1 weekly g/g video and anymore over half of them are nylon clad and don't even get into barefoot worship until 3/4 of the way thru the clip.
and 2 words, Sammie Rhodes  i'll give FWS 10/10 | ||
|
footworshipstudiosdotcom Joined: 2007-04-23 Posts: 913 Files: 0 Thanked: 0 Downloaded: 0 Uploaded: 0 |
Thanks for the great helpful comments!!!
Yes, that is the way I feel about it too, Dirty, but there appears to be a lot of guys who do like it, so to each his own! Thanks, Nouhan! I obviously experimented with diff time lengths per scene and found 5 or 6 mins too short and anything over 12 mins becomes kinda superfluous. 8-10 mins when edited provides for just about the right amount of diff positions and allowance for shooting time (a major consideration, I assure you) I am not sure what you mean by "desinterlaced". These are Quicktime movs and I do de-interlace them. I'm already pushing quality levels higher than I should, now around 20-30 mb per minute!!! Thanks and please send more ideas. Thanks, Solereaver!! Awesome review. Yes, I try to make my site accessible to a lot of people. A lot of people will spend $19.95 for a very good site, but I think the sites charging $25-$35, which is the norm now, make it harder for a lot of people. And I make sure my loyal regular members only pay $14.95 for extra months. Re. acting like they have a foot fetish: I have learned this is very important and if I hire a girl more than once, I can assure you they do like other girls and female feet. Yes, Sammie Rhodes is unbelievable and a good example of a girl who truly loves other girl's feet (& getting worshipped by them too) Thanks! Sammie Rhodes ( 2nd pic with Jandi Lin ) :
Webmaster - Foot Worship Studios
| ||
|
Solekid2u Joined: 2003-02-23 Posts: 1,129 Files: 0 Thanked: 0 Downloaded: 0 Uploaded: 0 |
I also want to know what a lesser inkhorn is. I don't care if it's a grammatical error, a typo or plain made up - it's the most awesome phrase I hae ever come by - and I shall try to slip it into conversation somehow during my daily deeds. | ||
|
Solekid2u Joined: 2003-02-23 Posts: 1,129 Files: 0 Thanked: 0 Downloaded: 0 Uploaded: 0 |
Sorry to digress, but both "lesser" and "inkhorn" are legitimate words - yet if you google "lesser inkhorn" - you see that that specific combination of words has never been uttered anywhere online until this thread - the odds on finding two legitimate words (in the form adjective/noun) that have never been used before are astronomical.
Purple pig, Wet gibbon, angry fruit, heavy worm... all have hundreds of hits - it's really a rare occurance to find the only one. I think it may mean an overuse of color or something. Sk | ||
|
footworshipstudiosdotcom Joined: 2007-04-23 Posts: 913 Files: 0 Thanked: 0 Downloaded: 0 Uploaded: 0 |
Very funny Solekid!! You're right it's a cool word. I know he wants "less of" something, but I have thought about it & can't fathom what he actually meant. Or he was using it correctly: An inkhorn is an inkwell made out of horn. It was an important item for many scholars and soon became symbolic of writers in general. Later it became a byword for fussy or pedantic writers. He must mean when I describe the foot worship scenes! Thanks
Webmaster - Foot Worship Studios
| ||
|
Solekid2u Joined: 2003-02-23 Posts: 1,129 Files: 0 Thanked: 0 Downloaded: 0 Uploaded: 0 |
I was on the exact same trail but then went to the website to check out the writing style and it really isn't anything out of the ordinary - unless inside the members section you go into massive metaphrocial prose about foot-suckin...lol. Which I doubt.
I guess we will never know. Sk P.S - Again sorry for hijacking the thread - I should learn to be a little more inkron in life.
| ||
|
SoleReaver21 Joined: 2002-04-21 Posts: 153 Files: 0 Thanked: 0 Downloaded: 0 Uploaded: 0 |
I'm planning on resubscribing soon (i like to let a healthy number of updates build up between my subscriptions, wish i could just be a perm subscriber but u know, money, blah.
@$*@%*#, the set my avatar is from, the vid where the 2 models are standing over the blonde and dipping their does into her mouth is my fav scene on your site, especially when they're tandem dipping and the shot is showing it from the sole side. Would love to see more of that, with veiny feet and high arches doing the dipping keep up the good work! | ||
|
footworshipstudiosdotcom Joined: 2007-04-23 Posts: 913 Files: 0 Thanked: 0 Downloaded: 0 Uploaded: 0 |
Hi Norcow. It's been years since you graced us with your negativity. I will point out that every single one of yr 110 posts is an impolite, negative post that criticizes a webmaster or his product. Spank you, but I know what deinterlacing is. I happen to create the "screen caps" before I deinterlace the video. Which leads me to believe you haven't even watched any of my videos, Mr. Critic. Once again you haven't been paying much attention, because all my members & most regulars on Mousepad know I am the webmaster, director and photographer. You are looking for every negative you possibly can (for some reason), so you're having a much different experience than my hundreds of loyal members. But quickly: my photos look excellent, they are hi-rez (1200x1200); I do use professional Smith-Victor hot lights without flash; I have been shooting in SD and just started HD and I have always used top of line equipment. My models are great & all my regular girls are truly into other girls & their feet. Thanks for your comments, I always appreciate any feedback. Even if yours tend to be excessively negative and way off the mark. Webmaster - Foot Worship Studios
| ||
|
footworshipstudiosdotcom Joined: 2007-04-23 Posts: 913 Files: 0 Thanked: 0 Downloaded: 0 Uploaded: 0 |
It is obvious that Norcow, from everything he says, has never even been a member of my website. Hence, it is he who does not belong in this thread. His obsessive negative reviews apply to my preview section! Has it ever occurred to you, Norcow, that the free sample pics & vids are lesser quality than the member versions? I make the sample pics 100-150k and sometimes smaller in dimension, while the member pics are 300-400k. The sample vids are well under half the quality of the member vids. It’s funny when you come across people who think they know everything & tell the world about it, when they have no clue. As to whether my posts are even allowed in the Review Section (it’d be absurd if they weren’t) Norcow needs to reread the sticky thread at the head of the Review Section, written by the owner/top moderator of the Mousepad: “* representatives from the sites you are reviewing will have equal opportunity to respond to your praise or critiques. This is a level playing field.”
Webmaster - Foot Worship Studios | ||
|
| |
