Does anyone else feel that the feet cant be attractive without knowing what the rest of the lady look like? I go through the enthusiast comment and I dont see any nice feet because I dont know whether the woman is attractive or not. Does anyone else have this issue? Or am I just really shallow?

shallow lol it is NORMAL to like a woman for more than just her feet, it is not normal to only care about one body part

the excuses faceless foot models have are always lame, nobody loses their job for just modeling their feet

the stalker excuse really makes me laugh the most because many of these girls show everything, do foot parties and i assume never had a major problem with stalkers

janet mason for example goes by her real name and regularly meets with fans

many women model lingerie and bathing suits on the side while having a career, foot modeling is no worse

they don't show their face because they are probably ugly and can't get attention from men in real life, many foot guys only care about feet so foot forums are the perfect place for them to get the male attention they don't get in the real world

Once a pic is on the internet it is there to stay, and can also be lifted, modified and reposted in a quite different context than its original. It is quite possible that a woman's life could be totally destroyed as a result of publication of her picture, either career-wise or even to actual loss of life. Just because it starts out as modelling her feet does not mean that it will always be that way - remember there's some real weirdos out there and the things they're prepared to do are boundless.
Yes it's very nice to see what the feet are attached to (mostly) but if it is a choice between seeing the feet without the face and not seeing them, I'll take my chances that their owner is not ugly (or male) and go for seeing them, thanks, and respect the wishes of their owner.

DownUnder wrote:

---

Wanocki, that last sentence is pretty harsh. And as much as you argue otherwise, there will be girls (and plenty of them) who do worry about flaunting their identities on the web, and no amount of arguing will change their mind. And I do respect that.

Rather than bemoaning about girls' reluctant to show their face in feet shots (and I am one of those who bemoan that), can we use this forum to think about how to alleviate those fears?

i'm willing to bet most of these women have myspace or facebook profiles, they show their real name and have tons of pictures that probably include family along with location and where they work

are they getting stalked or does that only apply to the "creepy foot guys"

as for alleviating their fears i already said that many of them go by their real name, do foot parties, etc and big surprise they are still living a normal life

these faceless foot models are just as insecure as the foot guys that can't even tell their wife they have a foot fetish, they just don't want to be associaed with those "disgusting body parts on the ground"

remember we are talking about foot modeling here, nothing pornographic

Wanocki wrote:

---

i'm willing to bet most of these women have myspace or facebook profiles, they show their real name and have tons of pictures that probably include family along with location and where they work

are they getting stalked or does that only apply to the "creepy foot guys"

as for alleviating their fears i already said that many of them go by their real name, do foot parties, etc and big surprise they are still living a normal life

these faceless foot models are just as insecure as the foot guys that can't even tell their wife they have a foot fetish, they just don't want to be associaed with those "disgusting body parts on the ground"

remember we are talking about foot modeling here, nothing pornographic

The issue isn't about stalking. Some girls just don't like having pictures taken, be it feet or their face. As a photographer I have asked to photograph people on the street (men and women, not feet-related), if they say no, I thank them and move on. I'm not going to stand there and argue with them.

Yes, we can tell them, "but Paris Hilton splashes her face on magazines everyday and you don't see her being self-conscious!" - but it isn't going to change their mind.

We can sit here all day calling them self-conscious, shallow, insecure etc etc. It isn't going to do a thing.

I prefer feet with face too, but I'm with Tony: given a choice between feet without face or no feet at all, I'd choose the former any day.

Wanocki wrote:

---

my question is how does a girl get an ego boost from guys telling them they have sexy feet? if a chick never saw my face but said i had sexy feet, i would think nothing of it

she could use that fodder to manipulate her man somehow (currently or one day down the line). u could not. that is the difference

CanadaFtFreak wrote:

---

:

First of all, Im totally like most guys in here - feet without faces does NOTHING for me. Im not interested in all & therefore dont usually frequent them. BUT - to suggest that "they don't show their face because they are probably ugly and can't get attention from men in real life," is so ridiculous I cant even begin to analyse it

i disagree, the main reason any woman posts feet pics is to get male attention. it isn't hard to impress the average foot guy, they post up feet pics and they get the "you are so sexy" comments that they always wanted to hear

the majority of the ones that show their face are far from knockouts, they use the feet to get the compliements they always wanted

I have taken photos of at least 50 women. Not a single one was ugly (although in fairness, probably 4-5 were just "average"). 5 were former models - in other words, all pretty darned attractive (because why would I personally go to the trouble to take pics of someone I dont find sexy?). I rarely have shared or posted these - but - in the cases where I did, all but 1 asked that their faces werent shown. Trust me, it wasnt because they werent pretty. Ironically, the one who DIDNT mind her face being shown was probably one of the less attractive!!

why do they model at all if they want their face hidden?

Yes, most of these women have facebook profiles. Some have - shock - pics of them barefoot - but as Tony pointed out, we're now talking about context A picture of a women sitting on her couch barefoot is likely never to be taken out of context. A series of her with her feet up on a table, scrunching, spreading & generally "posing her feet" will most certainly be taken in a different light. Depending upon where a woman worked, this could be grounds for dismissal, for sure.

bringing up facebook was my way of saying how ridiculous it is for them to think they could be stalked after posting feet and face pics

on facebook they post their full name, location, and place of work

if they are truly worried about stalkers they probably should delete their facebook account, that's the thing they aren't worried about stalkers

like i said they use their feet to get male attention but at the same time they are just as insecure as foot guys that can't tell their wife they like feet

and you bring up getting fired, well the majority of facebook profiles i see shows pics of them getting drunk and doing things that a boss might frown on

but posting a pic of them showing their feet to a camera is grounds for dismissal lol

Jurrappersnappa said "My wife has exquisite feet. High arch, perfect soles, beautiful toes. But never in a thousand years would I post a picture of her face on her. But that is because she is a school teacher. There is a gigantic difference between that and a jobs such as lets say a female lawyer" - while I appreciate (and agree with your point about not posting pics of your wife's face) - i completely am at a loss at how it would be somehow easier for a female lawyer to do so. What if that lawyer had kids? What if her law firm had a policy about internet exposure (many do - and even things like a facebook profile could lose her her job).

how many lawyers do you really think post pics of their feet on the net seriously? a female lawyer is basically an alpha female

lets be real here, the women that post jerkoff material on the net are the low self esteem type, a woman smart enough to be a lawyer isn't too worried about what men think of her feet

Also, Wanoki said 'remember we are talking about foot modeling here, nothing pornographic' - fetish modeling, while not "pornographic" certainly has a stigma attached to it. There's a world of difference between (as mentioned above) one pic snagged off of facebook or photobucket - and an entire series including all sorts of foot poses, where the foot is obviously the centre of attention. Plus, dont forget that often these anonymous models will do things like footjobs etc - that IS pornographic.

what about swimsuit and lingerie modleing? these women all have careers, only the heidi klum's of the world make a living with their looks

they aren't losing their jobs, and it is more excusable to hide the face if she is doing footjobs but most of them are just posting pics of their feet

why post pics on the net at all if a career is at risk?

.

lol why else would they post pics?

use logic

Wanocki, so women who refuse to show their face when posing their feet are "probably ugly and can't get attention from men in real life" (#2), and those who do post are "the low self esteem type, a woman smart enough to be a lawyer isn't too worried about what men think of her feet" (#12).

You've certainly got an attitude against women.

I have no problem with pictures of feet without showing a face. I can understand that some people don't want to see their face on the internet.

Wanocki wrote:

---

i disagree, the main reason any woman posts feet pics is to get male attention. it isn't hard to impress the average foot guy, they post up feet pics and they get the "you are so sexy" comments that they always wanted to hear

There's a problem with your argument:
A large portion of the faceless pics being posted are done so by the MALES, not the females. "hey, this is my wife/friend/sis in law" etc. The guys are the ones posting them in many cases, not the models themselves. In many cases (ie, when Ive posted friends pics) they have said "sure, but dont show my face" because they want to remain anonymous. To be honest, they probably have no interest in hearing what horny foot guys say about them either way, they are just letting us post them because they cant reflect on them.

the majority of the ones that show their face are far from knockouts, they use the feet to get the compliements they always wanted

I actually dont disagree with this - but this almost contradicts your own argument! If the ones who do show their faces (and therefore the only ones we can judge) are often "far from knockouts" then would it not stand to reason that a large percentage of those who dont show their faces would be pretty? Listen, no one is saying all women who wont show their faces are hot - I can guarantee you many arent - we are just (as a group) taking exception to the fact that you are trying to somehow lump all women into one group.

why do they model at all if they want their face hidden?

Maybe you missed my initial point. These are women that have modelled for me. No problem showing their face - to me. When Ive suggested I share the pics, they usually will say "uh...ok...sure but dont show my face" - I dont want this coming back to me at all." So in answer to your question - they modelled everything, face included, for me - they just would rather that complete strangers dont see them. In fact in most cases they havent been interested in seeing comments at all after Ive posted the pics.

bringing up facebook was my way of saying how ridiculous it is for them to think they could be stalked after posting feet and face pics on facebook they post their full name, location, and place of work if they are truly worried about stalkers they probably should delete their facebook account, that's the thing they aren't worried about stalkers

I wasnt particularly disagreeing with you about facebook. I dont think that women are likely to get stalked by posting pics on here - they would much more likely get stalked if they posted pics here, included their real names AND had facebook AND allowed people to be their friends. I know at least a couple of Feetheat models do that & i shake my head at the danger they could be setting themselves up for.
Still, you seem to missing the point of context. Posting pics of yourself in a series of barefoot poses may not be a big deal, but with the next post from yours shows a footjob series, people are going to look at it differently - especially seeing as we are talking about POSED pic series, not candid.


Wanocki, Im not trying to give you a hard time. I think your words sometimes come off harshly but I think deep down you're a good guy. I just dont like the generalizations. And while Im sure many women fall into the categories you are describing, I have problems with the "this is the way it is" statements that some are making in this thread.

I agree with the statements above. While of course I do prefer to see a face with the feet, it doesn't bother me any to just see a picture of feet without a face. Like footmeister said, if I could tell they are a woman's feet and the feet are absolutely gorgeous, I will give the credit and think to myself, "wow those are some nice feet." I don't think that the women who show their feet only are insecure about the way they look and therefore turn to their feet to get the attention they wanted; they would just rather remain anonymous as said. I personally don't think there is any direct correlation between a woman's looks on whether she shows her face with her feet or not.

I say different strokes for different folks. Me, I have no interest in the pics if you cant see what she looks like so I just seek out the ones that do. There's plenty out there.

what does it achieve? well typically when you want things to change and you don't like the way things are going, you have to speak up

how can something change for the better when youare quiet about the things that bother you?

lol we really aren't here to talk racism, poverty, etc, this is a jerkoff forum if you haven't noticed

the only solution is to ignore these faceless "models" but that isn't happening because many foot guys don't care if the girl is fat and ugly, as long as she has nice feet

heck i don't think foot guys even care if they are nice based on what i see, guys are saying "your feet are so hot" and i'm ready to puke looking at the same pic, being alive seems to be the only requirement

as long as there are low standard "all i care about is feet" foot guys, there will always be faceless foot "models" in need of male attention posting feet only pics

just think about it for a second, chicks think guys are perverts for staring at a chicks chest or only liking her for her body

what would they think of a guy getting off on a faceless foot "model"? hmmm...

Wanocki wrote:

---

lol we really aren't here to talk racism, poverty, etc, this is a jerkoff forum if you haven't noticed

the only solution is to ignore these faceless "models" but that isn't happening because many foot guys don't care if the girl is fat and ugly, as long as she has nice feet

heck i don't think foot guys even care if they are nice based on what i see, guys are saying "your feet are so hot" and i'm ready to puke looking at the same pic, being alive seems to be the only requirement

as long as there are low standard "all i care about is feet" foot guys, there will always be faceless foot "models" in need of male attention posting feet only pics

just think about it for a second, chicks think guys are perverts for staring at a chicks chest or only liking her for her body

what would they think of a guy getting off on a faceless foot "model"? hmmm...

That is a very valid point, I do agree as well. I think that sort of behavior does give foot fetishism a bad name with some women and that is why they find it weird, b/c the guy only focuses solely (no pun intended lol) on her feet and that's it. I know many women are actually ok with foot fetishism as a part of their overall sex lives, as long as the guy is able to "get off" on other things as well. A lot of times all the guy focuses on is the woman's feet, and this turns the woman off b/c it makes it seem like he doesn't appreciate/care about the rest of her as well. I strongly believe it's not the foot fetish in general that they find weird, it's the way you carry yourself about having one. Sure if I do see a faceless picture with just feet and the feet are indeed nice, I will think to myself those are a nice pair of feet, but it takes more than that to get me to be attracted to you. This in a way ties in with the topic about dating or marrying someone just b/c she had nice feet, or have you ever tried to keep a girl just b/c she had nice feet. I'm not sure what the exact title of the thread was, but you get the point lol.

me too...................... no face. feet mean nothing then...

I dont want to beat a dead horse & i think Ive already made my point, but Im curious about a "real life example."

I (like most in this thread) have said that I am not particularly interested in feet only pics. That being said, like most in the thread Ive said I understand why some women wouldnt want their pics on here. I have 2 daughters & would never dream of showing my wife's feet pics, with her face, on a foot fetish board - because of context. Now, the question is this:

Here is a pic from a series I did with a friend. She posed for about 200 pics over a few sessions. She had no problem modelling her feet (and face). She's spent time as a professional model & is very pretty (and no, i have no "affiliation" - i havent dated her - she's way out of my league...but then so's my wife, so who knows)...........anyway...... when I asked her if I could post them online she said "uhm...ok, sure...i dont care - just dont show my face if its some fetish board" (again, someone concerned about context).

So, here's a pic of her.




So...I shouldnt post any more of them? Is that what this thread is leading me (and anyone else who might have similar situations & photos) to believe?

Just want to clear this up ;)

CanadaFtFreak wrote:

---

I dont want to beat a dead horse & i think Ive already made my point, but Im curious about a "real life example."

I (like most in this thread) have said that I am not particularly interested in feet only pics. That being said, like most in the thread Ive said I understand why some women wouldnt want their pics on here. I have 2 daughters & would never dream of showing my wife's feet pics, with her face, on a foot fetish board - because of context. Now, the question is this:

Here is a pic from a series I did with a friend. She posed for about 200 pics over a few sessions. She had no problem modelling her feet (and face). She's spent time as a professional model & is very pretty (and no, i have no "affiliation" - i havent dated her - she's way out of my league...but then so's my wife, so who knows)...........anyway...... when I asked her if I could post them online she said "uhm...ok, sure...i dont care - just dont show my face if its some fetish board" (again, someone concerned about context).

So, here's a pic of her.




So...I shouldnt post any more of them? Is that what this thread is leading me (and anyone else who might have similar situations & photos) to believe?

Just want to clear this up ;)

i don't see how that pic could get somebody in trouble

the issue here is with girls posting their pics themselves, girls that look for male attention while hiding their face

not the girls that model for you and have no interest in jerkoff forums or need jerkoff forums for male attention

haha i do not have a problem with CFF's girls or yours

Jurrappersnappa wrote:

---

that pic does nothing for me. So personally I would say dont post it without a face. Sure she might look fine through beer goggles, but after the fuzzy face goes away you may want to chew your arm off to get away in the morning.

Thats all i wanted to know. Thanks. Wont post any more pics.



See how complaining about something can ruin it for everyone? Its funny, back when people were appreciative about posts - and simply ignored the ones they didnt like, this place had waaaaaaaaaay better content. Oh well.

Wanocki wrote:

---

CanadaFtFreak wrote:

---

Jurrappersnappa wrote:

---

that pic does nothing for me. So personally I would say dont post it without a face. Sure she might look fine through beer goggles, but after the fuzzy face goes away you may want to chew your arm off to get away in the morning.

Thats all i wanted to know. Thanks. Wont post any more pics.



See how complaining about something can ruin it for everyone? Its funny, back when people were appreciative about posts - and simply ignored the ones they didnt like, this place had waaaaaaaaaay better content. Oh well.

complaining brings change for postitive reasons too, what does me complaining about faceless foot models change for the worse?

i never directly criticize pics, but why focus on one negative comment?

I agree with CFF, why can't people simply ignore material they don't like, unless they are blatantly illegal. Perhaps the internet age has given people the licence to freely criticise behind anonymity without responsibility to anyone.

And Wanocki, I agree with your approach too to not directly criticise pics. There are PLENTY of photos on the Pad that I do not like, and if I criticise every single one of them my post count would be around 10,000. But then again, focussing on negatives is human nature - political campaigns and tabloid newspapers have used that tactic for decades. Especially since Jurra's criticism is personal in nature.

Finally, I must ask you, why do you think complaining MUST bring positive reasons? Are you THAT convinced that your criticisms must be the Word of God?

for the record CFF, from what i can see of that girl she looks pretty good

don't focus on the negative